• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
American Idea Foundation

American Idea Foundation

Measuring Results, Expanding Opportunity, Improving Lives.

  • Contribute
  • About
    • Paul Ryan
    • Our Team
  • Mission
    • 2024 Progress Report
  • Approach
  • News
    • Blog
    • Press
  • Contact

Mike

Do the Math: Benefits of Saga Education’s math tutoring add up

August 11, 2025 by Mike

By: AIF Staff

Started in 2014, Saga Education is a high-dosage math tutoring program for students in grade 9 delivered by a combination of in-person tutors and technology-enabled support systems. Saga Education uses high-impact, in-person and online tutoring to transform public education outcomes for diverse student populations.

Saga Education focuses on math for a specific reason, because Algebra 1 is a pivotal gateway subject to high school graduation and long-term economic mobility.

According to the American Institutes for Research, 85% of students who pass Algebra 1 in 9th grade graduate within four years, compared to only 21% of those who never pass. The ability to pass Algebra 1 is an acute problem for Hispanic, African American, and lower-income students.

Saga Education directly addresses this issue by delivering in-school-day tutoring that leverages the power of human capital and modern technology to support students facing external challenges, like income disparities and racial barriers.

Saga Education works with school districts around the country to implement their tutoring curriculum into the regular school schedule. Saga Education tutors work in small groups, 1 tutor to 2-3 students, and they hold sessions 3 times per week for 30-50 minutes per day. The tutoring received is a dedicated, credit-bearing course embedded with students’ daily class schedules and delivered in addition to their core math classes. The Saga Education teachers, most of whom are recent college graduates being provided an annual stipend, stay with students throughout their educational journey and combine academic instruction, mentoring, and strong school-to-home relationships.

This evidence-based curriculum and model has been the subject of multiple Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and is currently being deployed in several Chicago-area schools.

As part of their Chicago High-Impact Tutoring Program, Saga Education delivers its academic support program to students entering Algebra 1 at 16 different Chicago Public High Schools. Each Chicago Public High School selects a modality and a program model (in-person, live-online, or a hybrid) and then, a cohort of 53 tutors, who are trained in a specific 2-week program, provide consistent, structured support to small groups of students throughout the academic year.

Saga Education has already completed two rigorous, large-scale Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) evaluating the impact of its math tutoring model for low-income 9th and 10th grade students in Chicago. Among the outcomes, researchers found:

– Improved math achievement at the end of the tutoring year.

– Persistent effects one to two years later.

– Improved academic performance: Tutored students saw an average increase of 0.25 points in math GPA in 11th grade.

A similar Saga Education program in New Mexico produced equally promising findings following a RCT in 2024.

According to Saga Education, when looking more holistically at their impact, the effect of the tutoring program was:

– Students learned up to 2.5 years’ worth of math in one academic year.

– Math course failures were reduced by as much as 63% and course failures in non-tutored subjects were reduced by as much as 26%.

– Student attendance improves by as much as 18 days per academic year.

Each of the RCTs found “that the program produced sizable, statistically significant effects on student math scores on the district tests at the end of the tutoring year.” They also found that the positive effect of the program persists over time.

As University of Chicago researchers summarized when analyzing Saga Education’s approach:

“It is possible to substantially improve academic skills by accounting for the challenges of individualizing instruction—among other things— and that these strategies can be effective even when implemented in traditional public high schools to broad, representative samples of students. These strategies seem to work even with  secondary school students, yielding  benefit-cost ratios comparable to promising early childhood programs. Evidently adolescence is not too late to realize large social benefits from human capital investment.”

Without question, Saga Education has produced promising initial results in helping students cross a critical educational threshold and pass Algebra 1.

The American Idea Foundation is proud to partner with the organization as they continue scaling and evaluating their high-impact tutoring program in the Chicagoland area. Our hope is by utilizing Saga Education’s methods and their trained tutors, more younger Americans will develop the math skills to propel them forward in life.

To learn more about the American Idea Foundation’s 2025 grant recipients, click here. 

Filed Under: Blog, In The News

Bringing Triple P’s Positive Parenting Program to Wisconsin communities

August 11, 2025 by Mike

By: AIF Staff

Former Speaker of the House and American Idea Foundation President Paul Ryan has long-believed that federal efforts like the Maternal Infant and Early Childhood Home Visitation (MIECHV) program provide a successful template to help break the cycle of multi-generational poverty. MIECHV is a hands-on, customizable, evidence-based intervention that improves the quality of life of a newborn child, their parent, and as a result, their broader community.

The effectiveness of MIECHV demonstrates that interventions early in a child’s life, particularly those aimed at helping multiple generations – specifically, parents and children – can make a profound impact, particularly if they are data-driven.

The potential power of programs designed to help both parents and their young children is why the American Idea Foundation will be working with the Running Rebels Community Organization in Milwaukee, WI to bring the universally-acclaimed Triple P Parenting Program, to Southeastern Wisconsin in 2025.

Triple P, which stands the “Positive Parenting Program,” is a system of community-level education and training programs for parents of children ages 0 through 16. The program focuses on delivering customized-tools for parents to utilize during the major developmental periods of a child’s life: infant, toddler, pre-school, elementary school, and as a teenager.

Triple P gives parents the skills to ensure a safe environment for their kids, to foster a positive learning atmosphere, to develop an understanding of assertive discipline, to set realistic expectations, and to care for themselves and their children.  The core services provided by Triple P include cognitive behavioral therapy; community mobilization; conflict resolution; counselling and social work; family therapy; parent training; skills training; and social emotional learning.

Just as the program is tailored to specific development periods of a child’s life, the Triple P system is also comprised of specific “levels,” which are bundles of services provided to families and communities based on need, including risk levels for child maltreatment. The more in-need, the more support that is provided through the Triple P programming.

The end goal of Triple P’s program is to help parents raise happy kids, to have routines that allow for their whole family’s success, to teach conflict-resolution skills, and to allow parents to reach a level of confidence and self-sufficiency when it comes to raising children.

The Triple P program is one of the earliest parenting interventions, started by an Australian doctor in the 1970’s, and it has been since implemented across the globe. Because of its long history and global reach, Triple P has a more extensive evidence base than any other parenting program in the world.

Triple P is an ideal example of how these successful programs can be founded on a basis of evidence, can maintain fidelity to data during the scaling and replication process, and can incorporate findings from its evidence base to better assist parents and families. Consider the growth of research into Triple P programs over time.

As the authors of a evaluation on the development and dissemination of Triple P said:

“Four decades of experimental clinical research have demonstrated that structured parenting programs based on social learning  models are among the most efficacious and cost-effective interventions available to promote the mental health and well-being of children, particularly children at risk of child maltreatment and developing social and emotional problems.”

Triple P is exactly that type of program, and the impact of the program has been positive in both communities throughout the U.S. and countries across the globe. As the authors of a comprehensive Triple P Evaluation noted:

“Various components of the Triple P system have been subjected to a series of controlled evaluations, and have consistently shown positive effects on observed and parent-reported child behavior problems, parenting practices, and parents’ adjustment across sites, investigators, family characteristics, cultures, and countries.

The substantial evidence base supporting Triple P to date includes 43 controlled trials addressing efficacy, effectiveness, and dissemination, as well as 22 service-based field evaluations.”

In 2017, these researchers engaged launched the U.S. Triple P System Population Trial, which tested the extent to which countries could implement the Triple P and see a reduction in child malnutrition. As the researchers noted, this 2017 study found that making Triple P universally available to parents in a country led to:

  • 13% fewer hospitalizations from child abuse injuries
  • 21% fewer out-of-home/foster care placements
  • 31% lower incidence of confirmed child abuse cases

This large-scale trial confirmed what other meta-analyses have found: Triple P has a positive effect on children’s behavior and adjustment, with more pronounced effects being seen in the toddler, pre-school, and elementary school periods.

Additionally, Triple P has been found to be cost effective, because better-equipped parents and healthier children result mean fewer engagements with the social safety net system.

Because of the positive impacts seen across the globe, the American Idea Foundation awarded a 2025 grant to the Running Rebels in Milwaukee, Wisconsin so they can bring the Triple P model to local parents and families who are in need.

Speaker Ryan has championed the example set by the Running Rebels’ Victor and Dawn Barnett and believes they can effectively introduce the concepts of the Triple P parenting program to Milwaukee families.

Funds from the American Idea Foundation will be utilized to train a cohort of Milwaukee-area parents with the Triple P model and then to collect evidence and research on the program’s impact. The hope is that not only will this effort contribute to the growing body of data around Triple P’s effectiveness but also assist Wisconsin families and children live happier and healthier lives.

To learn more about the American Idea Foundation’s 2025 grant recipients, click here. 

Filed Under: Blog, In The News

Ryan on Trump’s tariff agenda, the Fed.’s independence and macroeconomics

August 6, 2025 by Mike

By AIF Staff

Aspen, CO – This morning, live from the Aspen Economic Strategy Group meeting, Paul Ryan was interviewed on CNBC’s Squawk Box about the Trump Administration’s economic policies and the impact they are having on markets at home and abroad. In conversation with CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin, Ryan touched on the ongoing tariff fights, the Federal Reserve’s efforts to tame inflation, the future of Social Security, and more.

Watch the full interview here or read excerpts of Ryan’s responses below.

On the state of the U.S. economy:

“I think we’re driving the car with two feet. One foot on the gas. One foot on the brake.

On the gas, we have good tax policy that is pro-growth. We have regulatory relief that is coming, and we have this AI boom that will be great for productivity. And on the brake, we have tariff uncertainty and a debt crisis on the horizon which is going to mess with interest rates. I think all of that combustible mixture is giving people cause for concern.

The latest jobs numbers weren’t so good, so that’s what we’re talking about here. The whole point of this conference is what do you do to revive American prosperity and continue it, so there’s definitely a tariff discussion happening right now.” 

On the road ahead for the Administration’s tariff policy:

“I think [the tariffs] are the biggest deal out there right now. It’s the uncertainty….I think the market thinks that everything will be calm soon and I just don’t see that. They think the tariffs will settle into an easy and predictable place and I don’t think that’s going to happen. 

Why do I think that? Because it’s more than likely that Supreme Court will knock out IEPA, the law that is being used to justify tariffs but that doesn’t have the word “tariff” in it, and then the President is going to have to go to other laws to justify tariffs – Section 232, 201, 301 – and those are harder laws to operate with, so they’re dual tracking the tariffs now. But so, you have these trade agreements – I spent a lot of time on these trade agreements, it was one of my jobs in Congress on the Ways and Means Committee – and they could be a little upended if he loses in court and then he will have to revive the tariffs.

They justify tariffs based on trade deficits. I don’t think that’s the right way to go, but then we threw a 50% tariff on Brazil, and we have a trade surplus with Brazil, so there’s no rationale for this other than the President wanting to raise tariffs based on his whims and his opinions.

So, I think there are choppy waters ahead because I think the Administration is going to have some legal challenges and I think it’s going to be a while before it settles in….

I think tariffs are the wrong way to go. It makes you unproductive. It lowers living standards and is bad for our industries, long-term. It is good short-term politics, but bad long-term economics…. I do think we’re going to have tariffs for a while and I think the government is going to see this revenue, and with the deficits we have, it’s going to be hard [for a future President to turn them off.”

On the Federal Reserve and possible successors to Chairman Powell:

“I think the Kevin’s are great…. I think the people that President Trump is considering are qualified people and they all would be good Federal Reserve Chairs….

[The Federal Reserve] should be lowering interest rates. We are going into an interest-rate cutting environment…. I think the tariff uncertainty is still a thing, and I think it’s wise to wait for that, but with the latest labor market activity, I think September is the right time [to lower rates]…

My point is: We have an independent Federal Reserve. We have a Humphrey-Hawkins law that I have spent a lot of time on that makes an independent Fed. The President is going to do what he is going to do, and we’re still going to have an independent Fed. I am not worried about that changing, because that law is not going to change. It takes 60 votes in the Senate and that’s not going to happen.

All these people that they’re looking at for Federal Reserve Chair are qualified people. Plus, if we were going into an interest-rate increasing environment and we were in this posture, I would be worried. But we’re going into an interest-rate cutting environment anyway, so I’m not worried about the Fed’s independence ultimately being threatened.”

On the changes at BLS:

“It’s more than an eye-rolling exercise. I googled Bill Beach. Bill Beach has, for Republicans, impeccable, conservative economic credentials. He was Trump’s 1st BLS Administrator, and he said this is absolutely groundless, so I would look at what Bill Beach said. I would look at what Trump’s first BLS Administrator said and echo his sentiments.

I think the story goes away if they replace her with a legitimate person. If they put a political hack in there, then this will be really troubling, but if they put someone in there who is qualified, it probably goes away.  It was a norm breaking episode, and we have a lot of those these days.”

On possible debanking of conservatives:

“If it’s true, it is absolutely outrageous. They ought to be able to fix this through regulations so this doesn’t happen. If you are debanking someone based on their political beliefs, that is totally outrageous. I don’t know to what extent that it is happening, but if it is, that’s outrageous…. This ought to be settled pretty easily through clear regulations.”

On Secretary Bessent’s comments on Social Security:

“I spent a lot of time on this issue. You still need Social Security… Social Security is insolvent in 2032. There is a big problem of a 26% across-the-board benefit cut when that occurs. We need to get ahead of that, and the best way to do that is to grow. My kids are going to get a -1% rate of return on their Social Security taxes, so we ought to be able to reform the program so they get a better rate of return. These bonds won’t be enough to replace that but we should reform the program so it gets better returns for future retirees and do so in a package that actually saves Social Security from insolvency.”

Filed Under: In The News, Press Release

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 47
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Contribute
  • About
    • Paul Ryan
    • Our Team
  • Mission
    • 2024 Progress Report
  • Approach
  • News
    • Blog
    • Press
  • Contact
Copyright © 2023 American Idea Foundation. Inc. All rights reserved.