Blog

By: AIF Staff

Washington, DC – At a virtual event hosted jointly by the Urban Institute and the American Enterprise Institute, former House Speaker Paul Ryan and former Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo announced the creation of Commission on Artificial Intelligence and the Future of the American Workforce, which they will jointly chair. 

The Commission will be a year-long initiative that brings together leaders from industry, labor, academia, and government to develop an actionable policy framework for AI-driven employment disruption.  

Watch the virtual announcement here and check out Speaker Ryan’s opening statement, as prepared for delivery, below.  

Good morning, everyone. I want to thank my good friend, Secretary Gina Raimondo, for agreeing to chair this Commission with me. 

Just this past weekend, elected officials from Donald Trump to Bernie Sanders to Jay Obernolte threw out various policy ideas on AI. Last week, we saw massive swings in tech stocks. Last month, Anthropic’s Mythos model made waves in the national security space. 

Make no mistake: The AI revolution is here and Washington, DC needs to quickly wrap its heads around the specific policy challenges that it is going to present for American workers and job creators. 

America will be better-served if we take an evidence-based approach to developing AI policy and that’s why this Commission will bring in the perspectives of academics, technologists, leaders from labor and business, and thought-leaders from across the political spectrum. Having the support of AEI and the Urban Institute, two gold-standard research organizations, will ensure this is a substantive endeavor focused on real solutions, as opposed to partisan soundbites. 

My view is simple: We stand at a critical crossroads where technological innovation meets the dignity of human work. Artificial intelligence is actively rewriting the rules of our economy. 

Over a century ago, Pope Leo XIII responded to the Industrial Revolution by writing Rerum Novarum, reminding the world that capital and labor are fundamentally interdependent. Recently, Pope Leo XIV built upon that very foundation with Magnifica Humanitas, noting that while technology can be an ally, it requires thoughtful parameters and policy responses so that it remains a force for good. 

The desire and ability to create Artificial Intelligence shows our immense capabilities as humans, but we must never allow technology to replace or overtake the value of the individual worker.

Throughout my time in Congress, my focus was always on expanding upward mobility and economic opportunity using an evidence-based, data-driven approach. 

I watched firsthand as my hometown of Janesville, Wisconsin faced severe economic restructuring when the GM plant closed. I know what happens to families when the economic ground shifts beneath their feet. 

We cannot afford to let the AI transition happen by accident; we must shape it with intention and with an eye towards helping those whose careers and lives will be most acutely impacted.

That is why we are launching the Commission on AI and the Future of the American Workforce. This commission is structured to deliver clear, practical utility to two specific groups: policymakers and the employer-employee ecosystem.

For my former colleagues in Congress and policymakers, this Commission is designed to provide specific solutions and ideas to particular aspects of challenges that AI will impose on the workforce. 

I spent 25 years as a staffer and Member of Congress, so I know how difficult it is to govern at the speed of technological change. 

This initiative will not produce an academic report to sit on a shelf. Instead, it will provide a practical roadmap of actionable options to consider as lawmakers attempt to assist workers and incentivize growth. 

For employers and their employees, this Commission aims to address the immediate realities of the free market. 

In my work at Teneo and Solamere Capital, I see leaders every day who are actively grappling with the AI challenge. They want to innovate, but they also want to protect their workforce. This Commission will bridge that gap. 

We will help employers understand how to integrate AI to augment human capability rather than simply automate it away. We will advance ideas that clear pathways for employees to upskill into the high-demand, high-paying jobs of tomorrow.

We can achieve both technological leadership and human flourishing. By bringing together the best minds from the public and private sectors, we will ensure that the future of AI is a future built by, and for, the American worker.

By: AIF Staff

Grove City, PA — Earlier this month, American Idea Foundation President and former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan joined former Vice President Mike Pence at Grove City College in Western Pennsylvania for a thought-provoking discussion on the enduring relevance of Ronald Reagan’s principles and how they can be applied to today’s economic, constitutional, and geopolitical challenges.

As part of Grove City’s 18th Annual Reagan Day Lecture, Vice President Pence asked Speaker Ryan about Reagan’s governing philosophy, the key elements of Reagan’s economic and foreign policy agendas, and how they still animate the modern conservative movement. Speaking to a full house of Grove City College students and supporters, Ryan and Pence encouraged future leaders in attendance to study foundational texts, reject performative politics, and “be happy warriors” who defend freedom and free-market principles with seriousness, integrity, and joy.

Video of the full event, Morning in America: Reagan’s Lessons for Today’s Challenges, and excerpts of Ryan’s responses follow.

On Reagan’s legacy and the foundations of conservatism:

“You have to go back to core, irreducible, primary principles to really understand what conservatism is and what it is you’re trying to conserve as a conservative. When we say conservative in this time, what we mean really is a classical, liberal, traditional conservative [who believes] natural rights and natural law were articulated in the Declaration of Independence and operationalized in our Constitution, and they work beautifully. These are timeless principles that have as their offspring freedom, free markets, liberty, self-determination and the institutions that we defend and support. Faith, family, and federalism. That’s what we’re seeking to conserve as conservatives.”

“Conservatism is about conserving natural rights and natural law—timeless truths that gave us freedom, free markets, and self-government.”

On advice for the next generation of conservatives:

“My mom told me, ‘You have two ears and one mouth—use them in that proportion,’ and that turned out to be some of the best advice I ever got. Don’t be this young guy who thinks he has it all figured out, because people older than you have lived so much more life. Don’t let ambition cloud your judgment, because when you do, you cut corners and compromise principles. TikTok says do this, Instagram says do that, and those pressures will tell a young and ambitious person to say whatever people want to hear.

“Don’t chase social media applause. Play the long game. Let the game come to you—don’t compromise principles for popularity…. Temperament matters. Be joyful, empathetic, and curious. When they expect anger, meet them with optimism and confidence.”

“Be a happy warrior—don’t be an angry troll—and articulate timeless principles in a persuasive, inclusive, and joyful way.”

On the debt crisis and fiscal responsibility:

“The most foreseeable and the most predictable crisis in our country is the debt crisis. It basically means we’re consigning the next generation to an inferior future. The legacy of this country, because of [our founding] principles, is that you leave the next generation better off, and when we were growing up, we all believed that because it was true. This is not what most [younger] Americans think these days, and in many cases, it’s not true. And if we keep on this path, we know it will not be true, and we will have severed that legacy for the first time.”

On trade, tariffs, and economic principles:

“The International Emergency Economic Powers Act… is a sanctions law. The word “tariff” doesn’t exist in it. Congress did not designate the President this kind of power to whimsically, on his own, tariff the whole world or any country—that power was not delegated from Congress to the Executive Branch.

Tariffs are a tax increase on the American people, and the vast majority of the costs are paid by American businesses and consumers. It’s not just bad economics; it’s based on a philosophy that life is a zero-sum game, that there’s a winner and a loser and nothing in between. That is not how it works—trade is a positive-sum game because both sides benefit.”

“Tariffs are taxes on Americans, and they rest on a zero-sum view of the world that just isn’t true…. If we want a mature economy, we must make things and sell them to the 94 percent of people who live outside America.”

On the dangers of moral relativism in today’s polarized environment:

“My worry in this day and age is [the type of populism] coming from the left and now from the right are morally relativistic versions of populism. Both of America’s political parties are kind of the parties of moral relativism—where might makes right, the ends justify the means, and the most important principle is just getting elected so that the other side is not elected. That is not supposed to be the end of this. The end of this is [supposed to be realizing] these principles that built this country and that we care about—life, liberty, freedom, self-determination and our rights coming from God, not from government. The kind of populism that is dominating both parties is not producing that.”

On Reagan’s moral clarity & support for allies in Ukraine:

“President Reagan spoke with moral clarity, and his speechwriters tried to soften those speeches, but he insisted on that clarity. I do worry that we’re losing the plurality for defending our principles the way President Reagan did. My successor, Rep. Bryan Steil, said the Ukraine aid vote was politically the hardest vote he’s taken all year, and that tells you how much the lines have shifted [in our party]. There are those voices in the conservative movement drifting into darker corners, back to the moral relativism of might-makes-right. The anti-Semitism that has always been over on the left is now percolating on the right. It’s very dangerous, very insidious, very immoral.”

On China, globalization, and strategic competition:

“We always believed that the more we traded with China and the more we had diplomatic exchange, the more they would move toward the practices of free, democratic nations—towards private property and towards respect for liberties, especially religious liberty. The opposite happened. [Welcoming China to world bodies] made sense at the time; it was a different leadership over there, and then Xi came in. I frankly regret the vote with hindsight, and I think free trade with free countries is the way to go. With mercantilist countries that cheat, steal, subsidize, and dump, you’ve got to play tough with them.”

On principled vs. unprincipled populism:

“[President Milei] in Argentina is a populist, but his populism is directly tied back to these conservative principles and universal truths, and that, to me, is good populism. The kind of populism we have today [in America] comes from the left, which is progressivism, but we also have a lot of this populism on the right as well. These two wings are almost forming a full horseshoe, but this populism is not rooted in these core principles. Populism untethered to principle— but that’s tethered instead to a cult of personality or whatever is deemed popular on a given day—is not what I would call “principled populism,” and regretfully, that [untethered populism] is what is dominant in our party right now.”

“Populism tied to principle can be powerful, but populism tied to personality becomes dangerous.”

By: AIF Staff

Since 2022, the American Idea Foundation (AIF) has awarded annual grants to organizations around the country that are developing a base of evidence and data around their programming and that are building on quantifiable metrics and research studies about the effectiveness of their interventions. This year, AIF will be supporting 7 distinct groups working on issues like childhood education, homelessness, proper parenting techniques, and poverty abatement. 

As the Heffernans’ said during an interview about the maturation of the program:  

“We created ASSISTments to help as many teachers and students as possible. After we learned that the ASSISTments intervention was effective, we set the goal to have every middle school student in the country get immediate feedback on their homework. 

We created ASSISTments to be used by real teachers and have been improving it with each grant. Because of the effectiveness of ASSISTments, we kept getting funded to make improvements allowing our user base to grow.”

ASSISTments aims to improve mathematics education by giving schools access to their proprietary online tools and by providing training for teachers so they can educate students using illustrative assignments aligned with testing-standards and curriculum. 

This tech-based programming also provides instant data to students and teachers, allowing them to adjust their instruction in real-time. The goals are to help students build math skills in real-time, to help them understand that mistakes are part of the learning process, and to utilize data and technological tools to improve test scores and engagement in math. 

 This video shows how ASSISTments works with schools, teachers, and students to improve math scores. 

Because its founders believed in the importance of data and real-time assessments, ASSISTments has developed one of the strongest bases of evidence across education interventions. 

A 2016 randomized controlled trial measured the impact of ASSISTments by studying 7^th grade students at 43 schools in Maine. The researchers found that: 

“[The] online mathematics homework intervention produced a positive impact on students’ mathematics achievement at the end of a school year. Students with low, rather than high, prior achievement benefited more. 

The intervention provided students with personalized feedback and hints immediately, more typically, students wait until the next day to know what they did right and wrong and to get help. When students struggled, they had additional opportunities to work toward mastery in supplementary problem sets. The intervention also enabled formative assessment practices for teachers, such as adapting their discussions of homework to fit students’ needs. Specific professional development was provided to teachers to enable them to enact these adaptive practices.”

Ultimately, test scores went up in standardized mathematics assessments and this study spurred additional research into the impact of ASSISTments. 

More recently, a replication study by North Carolina State University was conducted measuring 6,000 students at 63 different North Carolina schools. Though this study was impacted by COVID-19 and changing learning modalities, the study found that students whose teachers used ASSISTments in 7th grade had significantly higher scores on the North Carolina 8th-grade End-of-Grade math test compared to the control group. The effect size was similar to the Maine study and equally important, the positive impact of ASSISTments persisted with improved math scores over time. 

ASSISTments has been recognized by the federal What Works Clearinghouse and is one of the few mathematics-education interventions with credible evidence supporting it. Multiple researchers have found that ASSISTments does 3 critical things: 

1. ASSISTments provides long-term gains for students, improving test scores over multiple years. 
2. It narrows the achievement gap, with students of color seeing the strongest effects among subgroups.
3. It has a more profound impact in schools with higher percentages of economically disadvantaged students and those in resource-limited schools. 

Because of this commitment to evidence and because of the short-term and long-term benefits of ASSISTments, Maryland Governor Wes Moore announced he would provide 24,000 Maryland students with access to ASSISTments from 2024-2028. 

This effort, conducted as part of Maryland’s Partnership for Proven Programs will give participating schools access to ASSISTments, as well as a multi-layered support model that includes: 1) A full-day summer training for teachers, 2) 3-5 in-person coaching visits per year, and 3) implementation planning and regular progress check-ins with schools and district leadership. At the end of the four years, the goal is to see math achievement on standardized tests improve in Maryland and to build the base of evidence around this intervention. 

To understand the real-world impact that ASSISTments is having in classrooms across America, listen to one of the teachers who utilizes it and hear firsthand how it helps her students understand and learn math. . 

With data-driven solutions like ASSISTments, America’s students will have better access to modern educational tools and will have a deeper understanding of mathematics, which will have compounding benefits throughout their lives. The American Idea Foundation is proud to support ASSISTments as this evidence-based intervention helps school districts, teachers, and individual students.

To learn more about the American Idea Foundation’s 2025 grant recipients, click here.